Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > Blogs and Blogging
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2008-01-07, 05:45 PM   #1
NY Jester
ICQ:147*079*406
 
NY Jester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Rock*ME*Hardplace
Posts: 2,996
Send a message via ICQ to NY Jester Send a message via AIM to NY Jester
Very NewB question here...is it possible to have a "set and forget" type of feed in place as well as hand submit a couple times a week along with it?
__________________
The Sexy Side of Porn
NY Jester is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-01-07, 07:10 PM   #2
ronnie
Wheither you think you can or you think you can't, Your right.
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: midwest
Posts: 2,274
Send a message via ICQ to ronnie
Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jester View Post
Very NewB question here...is it possible to have a "set and forget" type of feed in place as well as hand submit a couple times a week along with it?
<short-winded>

Sure would be better, maybe make the difference. But wouldn't you still have sponsor posts that are duplicates? Seems Walrus has better ideas.

The set it and forget it idea would have worked a couple years back when there were directories where rank was determined by newest posts. Some folks took advantage.

</short-winded>
ronnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-01-07, 09:49 PM   #3
walrus
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
 
walrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,773
Send a message via ICQ to walrus Send a message via Yahoo to walrus
Quote:
Originally Posted by NY Jester View Post
Very NewB question here...is it possible to have a "set and forget" type of feed in place as well as hand submit a couple times a week along with it?
Theoretically, yes. No matter what aggregator you used you could have it posting with every feed update and then manually go in and add a post when you were in a creative mood.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ronnie View Post
<short-winded>

Sure would be better, maybe make the difference. But wouldn't you still have sponsor posts that are duplicates? Seems Walrus has better ideas.

The set it and forget it idea would have worked a couple years back when there were directories where rank was determined by newest posts. Some folks took advantage.

</short-winded>
Correct, you still would have a bunch of posts that were duplicates mixed in with a few original posts. I never believed that the duplicate content penalty was really a big deal. It just meant that after the big G found X number of duplicates it would move the rest into supplimental. But since G no longer has a supplimental, I would assume the most trusted sites (the X number) would be ok and all the others would head somewhere near the 1000 page or so.

Since I haven't tested my ideas yet, I couldn't tell you if they were a |goodidea or if people would at them. Perhaps more details will be forthcoming once I get a little further along the development curve but I will say, if I'm wrong I will have wasted a whole lot of time.
__________________
Naked Girlfriend Porn TGP
free partner account
walrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 AM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc