If a sponsor pays for advertising, Does that make them a better sponsor?

[[BV]]

Sorry Gonzo,

I answered your first question in my other replies even though I did not directly quote you. Your first question was:

Originally Posted by GonZo

What injustice is being done is what I really want to know.

Use the FOX news example. It's a pretty good analogy.

Originally Posted by GonZo

I noticed you didnt answer my question.
So now Ill ask you a few more.

1. If you werent trolling for a free or discounted ad then why even bring it up?

If I posted enough to be considered a regular on this board I would be insulted that youd think that the users of this forum arent intelligent enough to figure out which sponsors are the best.

After 10 years Id figure you know that advertising on a business forum isnt an accurate measure of "best".... I humbly gauge the amount on the checks as my means.

2. What does the average webmaster earn a month with your program?

I brought this up because I felt like it. Is it not a valid question? If it's not then delete the thread. Can we not discuss the affect of message boards on our industry?

I realise now it may be a bit controversial if you own and operate a forum, but do we not also talk about LinkLists, TGP's and Tube Sites and other businesses in Adult? and their affects on us?

Not everyone here has 10 years under their belt. There are webmasters of all kinds here. Do you think that everyone that watches FOX news can figure out that FOX has an agenda? A suspect alot don't.

As far as what my "average webmaster" makes. I guess that depends on what "average" is. Last month sent me 401 unique hits to BVCash. 182 of them went to BikiniVoyeur and he made 1 sale.

So can you see how my sites are very micro niche? Can you see how there are not huge traffic numbers in this niche?

I used to always be in Hoes.com top sponsor list (which was very cool for a little nobody like me) Props to Marc. I got many affiliates from that exposure for the year or so I was in the top 10. (as high as 3rd)http://www.hoes.com/sponsors/june2006.html

The sad part is that he no longer reports sites on that list unless he sends a minimum of 15,000 hits a month to them. So I am no longer listed
But he still sends me sales and I am grateful for that.

My strength is in numbers. Very few affiliates are going to make a living off this niche. It's just something to throw into their mix.

So that is where your theory is flawed:

Originally Posted by GonZo

After 10 years Id figure you know that advertising on a business forum isnt an accurate measure of "best".... I humbly gauge the amount on the checks as my means.

Your BVCash check will always be one of your smallest checks. You see what I mean?

Nice try though.

I hope I answered your questions in an adequate fashion.

Cheers,
BV

PS: If anyone else reading has any other questions in this thread that they feel were unanswered please point them out.

If there are no more questions then go ahead and DELETE THIS THREAD IF YOU SEE FIT GreenGuy!!!

I do not want to be accused of being a troll or a freeloader anymore.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by [BV]

...If there are no more questions then go ahead and DELETE THIS THREAD IF YOU SEE FIT GreenGuy!!!...

We don't delete threads...THAT would be censorship.

And I never said anything about you saying we should change our business model. I asked why you think that the business model of adult webmaster boards should be different than any other business model that sells ad space?

[[BV]]

Originally Posted by Greenie

We don't delete threads...THAT would be censorship.

And I never said anything about you saying we should change our business model. I asked why you think that the business model of adult webmaster boards should be different than any other business model that sells ad space?

Not all business models that sell add space are the same. Take Google for example. Their top add spots display right there next to whomever is able to rank high. No restrictions.

I'm sure there is room for improvement on anything. Nothing stays the same. We all evolve, up or down.

Here is just one scenario. (not saying it's the best option but it's another option)

Let's pretend for a moment that there were no paid adds at all here. The only adds here were your sponsors you use and they were given the same privileges as your current paid add sponsors. The only way you were paid was through your webmaster referrals.

What do you think your readers would think if they came here knowing that every add here was specifically endorsed by you rather than just selling adds to anyone that can afford to pay the toll?

That's just one scenario.

There could be many scenarios that might or might not be better, just depends better for whom.

It was brought to my attention just last night that PK started a new board. One of the neatest features was that thread starters had an option of displaying a top banner add at the top of each thread they started.

I thought that this was a cool feature and that might stimulate more threads. Of course there still has to be rules. But it has possibilities.

|goodidea or |badidea|

[Jim]

Originally Posted by [BV]

What do you think your readers would think if they came here knowing that every add here was specifically endorsed by you rather than just selling adds to anyone that can afford to pay the toll?

That part is a little offensive. We turn down sponsors weekly because of bad dealings we have heard of. We have also gotten rid of sponsors for treating webmasters poorly. And getting rid of sponsors costs a huge amount of money if you add up the refund and the amount of potential future earnings.

Don't think that we would ever allow a program to be a sponsor just because they offer money. Scumbags need not apply. You must be thinking of someplace else.

[[BV]]

Originally Posted by Jim

That part is a little offensive. We turn down sponsors weekly because of bad dealings we have heard of. We have also gotten rid of sponsors for treating webmasters poorly. And getting rid of sponsors costs a huge amount of money if you add up the refund and the amount of potential future earnings.

Don't think that we would ever allow a program to be a sponsor just because they offer money. Scumbags need not apply. You must be thinking of someplace else.

That was not my intention, sorry, I know you have canned some add sponsors. I remember.

But you do see my point right?

Semantics aside.

Do you promote and make sales with every sponsor that buys adds here?

That's the point I was trying to make.

[Jim]

Originally Posted by [BV]

That was not my intention, sorry, I know you have canned some add sponsors. I remember.

But you do see my point right?

Semantics aside.

Do you promote and make sales with every sponsor that buys adds here?

That's the point I was trying to make.

A little known fact is we have a master list that we go by when we consider a new advertiser. That list came from Greenie's stats. And, if I decide to have a sponsor that is not on that list that we don't know about, the first thing that happens is Greenie signs up and gives them a good try.

We learned and were told a long time ago that the sponsors on GGandJ are thought to be endorsed by us. We take that very seriously.

[[BV]]

Originally Posted by Jim

A little known fact is we have a master list that we go by when we consider a new advertiser. That list came from Greenie's stats. And, if I decide to have a sponsor that is not on that list that we don't know about, the first thing that happens is Greenie signs up and gives them a good try.

We learned and were told a long time ago that the sponsors on GGandJ are thought to be endorsed by us. We take that very seriously.

Well Kudos to you! Impressive! You should make that a "Well Known Fact"

I think that's a very important fact that should be advertised.

[GonZo]

I asked you since you were making the stink not Fox news.

If you werent trolling for some cheap ads maybe you have a litle resource envy then?

I think its a pretty lame question to ask on a free forum from 2 gents that have been around a long time and have helped out a number of us over the years [I registered my first domain in '93] and asked for nothing in return.

Im sorry you think my logic is flawed. Id be willing to bet that many of us feel that the best sponsors are the ones that send the largest checks. I can read Green Guys stats for myself. Hes posted them for years. I asked you what does your average webmaster make... I guess you are unwilling to answer that. So sad.

I wasnt trying for anything though. See Im not much for porn conspiracies or the man keeping fat fucking nobodies down.

Maybe Ive gotten sensative but I thought it was pretty rude to come into this free forum and ask questions that looked like they were made to put Mark and Jim in a bad light. I consider them to be some of the few HONEST people in this business with some integrity left.

If you dont want to look like a troll or a freeloader then maybe you shouldnt act like one.

Im sorry this thread isnt getting you the kind of response that maybe you hoped for but Im sure everyone appreciates the schooling on how a perfect webmaster forum shoud be ran.

[[BV]]

Originally Posted by GonZo

I asked you since you were making the stink not Fox news.

If you werent trolling for some cheap ads maybe you have a litle resource envy then?

I think its a pretty lame question to ask on a free forum from 2 gents that have been around a long time and have helped out a number of us over the years [I registered my first domain in '93] and asked for nothing in return.

Im sorry you think my logic is flawed. Id be willing to bet that many of us feel that the best sponsors are the ones that send the largest checks. I can read Green Guys stats for myself. Hes posted them for years. I asked you what does your average webmaster make... I guess you are unwilling to answer that. So sad.

I wasnt trying for anything though. See Im not much for porn conspiracies or the man keeping fat fucking nobodies down.

Maybe Ive gotten sensative but I thought it was pretty rude to come into this free forum and ask questions that looked like they were made to put Mark and Jim in a bad light. I consider them to be some of the few HONEST people in this business with some integrity left.

If you dont want to look like a troll or a freeloader then maybe you shouldnt act like one.

Im sorry this thread isnt getting you the kind of response that maybe you hoped for but Im sure everyone appreciates the schooling on how a perfect webmaster forum shoud be ran.

I answered your question concerning what my average webmaster makes. It's not much. I'm not sure how to gauge what an average webmaster makes. That's why I asked you what "average" is. I figured simply telling you what GG makes would give you that answer. Because he is definitely above average IMO, but because he sends traffic to many many sponsors his average checks from each are not going to be big.

On BVCash my best affiliate made 1750.30 last month and my worst made 1.48. With a total of 2509 affiliates. You do the math how you see fit.

You theory is flawed. You biggest check will be the sponsor that you send the most traffic too. If you send 10,000 clicks to sponsor A and and your check is $100.00, and you send 1000 clicks to sponsor B and your check is $10.00, by your theory sponsor A is better. That's retarded thinking.

I know GG & Jim are good people. That's not in dispute. They help people yes. This forum helps people. Not single handily though. Many people on this forum help people. Even me.

You have completely missed the whole concept here. Sorry.


Cheers,
BV

[GonZo]

Originally Posted by [BV]

You theory is flawed. You biggest check will be the sponsor that you send the most traffic too. If you send 10,000 clicks to sponsor A and and your check is $100.00, and you send 1000 clicks to sponsor B and your check is $10.00, by your theory sponsor A is better. That's retarded thinking.

Im not the one trolling for a cheap or free ad so I can see why youve had to start calling names now.

Im glad you keep responding though - you keep making your own case!

Youd think after 10 years you would get it.

[[BV]]

Originally Posted by GonZo

Im not the one trolling for a cheap or free ad so I can see why youve had to start calling names now.

Im glad you keep responding though - you keep making your own case!

Youd think after 10 years you would get it.

Whatever you say GonZo. You know you made a statement that is inaccurate. Your biggest sponsor check does not automatically equal your best sponsor.

You want to start a thread about just that topic? Prove me wrong?

[GonZo]

Originally Posted by [BV]

Whatever you say GonZo. You know you made a statement that is inaccurate. Your biggest sponsor check does not automatically equal your best sponsor.

You want to start a thread about just that topic? Prove me wrong?

You must not get many checks. Or maybe your have a different business plan. Im do this to make money. I dont count clicks I cash checks and assure you the sponsor that gives me the biggest one certainly is my best one!

I want to start another thread alright but Im a guest here.

[[BV]]

Originally Posted by GonZo

You must not get many checks. Or maybe your have a different business plan. Im do this to make money. I dont count clicks I cash checks and assure you the sponsor that gives me the biggest one certainly is my best one!

I want to start another thread alright but Im a guest here.

You're right I don't get many checks. I get wire transfers from ccbill and paycom. My CCBill wires are always larger because they process most of my affiliates sales.

That doesen't make CCBill better than Paycom now does it?

Of course not.

I don't promote any other sponsors. 99% of my traffic is my affiliates traffic to my revshare programs and I don't have any traffic leaks inside or out to send to other sponsors. Sorry.