If a sponsor pays for advertising, Does that make them a better sponsor?

[Jim]

Thanks Gonzo...
If every source of information in the world did not have the same business model, I might have gotten a little offended.

Part of the problem seems to be a poor choice of words. Starting with the work "censor". As I said, it doesn't apply. And then Greenie's analogy using "FOX" because of the Superbowl. His beer comparison was good. I didn't see our local brewery in any of the Superbowl commercials but I don't believe they feel slighted or "censored". But instead of using "FOX", he could have used NBC, CBS, BBC, CW or any television network.

[GonZo]

Originally Posted by Jim

Thanks Gonzo...
If every source of information in the world did not have the same business model, I might have gotten a little offended.

Part of the problem seems to be a poor choice of words. Starting with the work "censor". As I said, it doesn't apply. And then Greenie's analogy using "FOX" because of the Superbowl. His beer comparison was good. I didn't see our local brewery in any of the Superbowl commercials but I don't believe they feel slighted or "censored". But instead of using "FOX", he could have used NBC, CBS, BBC, CW or any television network.

Ive always enjoyed reading these grand conspracy therories that people think are contrived by board owners.

Whens the next double secret meeting so we can all decide which programs we want to push and which ones to censor for 2008?