The Official Link O'Rama Rejection Thread II

SheepGuy · 2008-08-25, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrMaryLou

It's the sister thing that kills it for me

I am not sure how you can change it other that redo the whole site.

Okay, that's cool. D2222 does make a good point though.
And if sisters were sacred a buddy of mine would have a hard time getting listed. None of these sisters were coerced into it because their dog ate their brothers couch, not that anything is wrong with that

I'm planning on building more sites on the same theme though, it's legal, it sells, and I've had no problems getting similar sites listed with the other big guys.

Greenguy · 2008-08-25, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p3rlphr33k

and the saga continues..... nice to back, he
so does link-o-rama consider this lesbian?
i figured babes would be appropriate considering gallery1 is a loner chic..any input?
http://btuz.com/ms/wetdreams/m3/index.html

The perfect category for that is WetWomen (and no, I'd not list that in a Lesbian category based on the 1st gallery)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Star Man

...Yeah,I wasn't sure if this one was gonna fly or not.I'm just experimenting with different unique layouts etc.

Just keep in mind that, the more you try to stretch or bend the rules, the more we notice you & the closer we look at things on your site. Don't see how much you can get away with, go one less & submit a site that will be listed & not cause problems like this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SheepGuy

Your submission:
Site Name: Twin Lesbian Blondes
Site URL: http://www.eatabeaver.com/freeblondetwins/
Category: Lesbian

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Reviewer Is Not Comfortable With Content

Hmmm.., anything I can do about this one? Maybe a title change? The girls are in their 20's and consenting adults, it's a completely legal site. I understand if you just don't like it, but I'd switch it around a bit and make a mirror if that would help.

It's that it's just them, which means it's incest & that's one of those things I'd rather not endorse. With those other sites - the Milton twins & whatnot, they are never alone with each other & they never touch each other in a sexual manner.

Plus, your pics are out of order

SheepGuy · 2008-08-25, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenie

It's that it's just them, which means it's incest & that's one of those things I'd rather not endorse. With those other sites - the Milton twins & whatnot, they are never alone with each other & they never touch each other in a sexual manner.

Plus, your pics are out of order

Fair enough. I was more worried about the pics being out of order as a possible cause of rejection to tell the truth

I tried, but I just couldn't find any natural order to put them in

Greenguy · 2008-08-25, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SheepGuy

...I tried, but I just couldn't find any natural order to put them in

Well, the ones where they're wearing the nighties go 1st.....

SheepGuy · 2008-08-25, 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenie

Well, the ones where they're wearing the nighties go 1st.....

I dunno, it's hard to say which one had a nighty on or off, who got naked first, who was doing who, I gave way too much thought to it anyways

Star Man · 2008-08-26, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenie

Just keep in mind that, the more you try to stretch or bend the rules, the more we notice you & the closer we look at things on your site. Don't see how much you can get away with, go one less & submit a site that will be listed & not cause problems like this.

Gotcha

papagmp · 2008-08-26, 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SheepGuy

Okay, that's cool. D2222 does make a good point though.
And if sisters were sacred a buddy of mine would have a hard time getting listed. None of these sisters were coerced into it because their dog ate their brothers couch, not that anything is wrong with that

I'm planning on building more sites on the same theme though, it's legal, it sells, and I've had no problems getting similar sites listed with the other big guys.

Hey - I resemble that remark

Licker4U · 2008-08-26, 04:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SheepGuy

None of these sisters were coerced into it because their dog ate their brothers couch, not that anything is wrong with that

Quote:

Originally Posted by papagmp

Hey - I resemble that remark

(My 16 yr. old stepdaughter admitted to her mother (my ex) that she and her 14 yr. old sister practiced kissing with each other so they wouldn't be inexperienced when a boy kissed them so it does happen

(But they're not twins)