The Official Link O'Rama Rejection Thread II

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by p3rlphr33k

and the saga continues..... nice to back, he
so does link-o-rama consider this lesbian?
i figured babes would be appropriate considering gallery1 is a loner chic..any input?
http://btuz.com/ms/wetdreams/m3/index.html

The perfect category for that is WetWomen (and no, I'd not list that in a Lesbian category based on the 1st gallery)

Originally Posted by Star Man

...Yeah,I wasn't sure if this one was gonna fly or not.I'm just experimenting with different unique layouts etc.

Just keep in mind that, the more you try to stretch or bend the rules, the more we notice you & the closer we look at things on your site. Don't see how much you can get away with, go one less & submit a site that will be listed & not cause problems like this.

Originally Posted by SheepGuy

Your submission:
Site Name: Twin Lesbian Blondes
Site URL: http://www.eatabeaver.com/freeblondetwins/
Category: Lesbian

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Reviewer Is Not Comfortable With Content

Hmmm.., anything I can do about this one? Maybe a title change? The girls are in their 20's and consenting adults, it's a completely legal site. I understand if you just don't like it, but I'd switch it around a bit and make a mirror if that would help.

It's that it's just them, which means it's incest & that's one of those things I'd rather not endorse. With those other sites - the Milton twins & whatnot, they are never alone with each other & they never touch each other in a sexual manner.

Plus, your pics are out of order