 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-18, 09:59 AM
|
#1 |
|
I want to set the record straight - I thought the cop was a prostitute
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 297
|
I highly doubt an investor is going to pay $300k for a brandable name. Depending on the quality of the domain, an end user might pay $300k. but any investor putting up that kind of cash is going to expect a significant return on equity for their investment.
Chances are as a noob, that you do not have a $300k domain name, but one that is maybe worth a couple of thousand to a domainer/investor. Without knowing the actual name, it is impossible to give you an accurate appraisal. |
|
|
|
2010-05-18, 11:16 AM
|
#2 | |
|
If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,177
|
Quote:
 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-18, 12:45 PM
|
#3 |
|
"Young dumb and full of cum"
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Porn Valley
Posts: 2,372
   |
Depends on the domain. There's people out there looking for good ones.
__________________
JAPANESE ADULT AFFILIATE PROGRAM |
|
|
|
|
2010-05-24, 02:37 AM
|
#4 | |
|
Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-26, 04:50 PM
|
#5 | |
|
I want to set the record straight - I thought the cop was a prostitute
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 297
|
Quote:
You're wrong. UDRP requires the trademark holder (Complainant) to have existing trademark rights prior to the domain being registered by the current domain owner (Registrant). Anyone trying to pull the bullshit that you suggest above would be tarred and feathered with a Reverse Domain Name Hijacking. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
