LL owners, are you on my blacklist :)

KG Gary · 2007-01-26, 07:08 PM

15 hits could still yield a sign up, and it doesn't cost you anything, so if you're getting listed regularly and there's no other issues why not keep on supporting the people sending you those free 15 visitors?

Todays small link list could be tomorrow's big link list, and loyalty goes a long long way.
Seems like this blacklist thing isn't the best idea, even if you're half-joking.

Hoes review within a couple of days. You'll know if you've been listed there.
FreesiteXXX, Virexy-Porn, & cfnmparty all review quite quickly - within a week or two I think.
Mark from Mark's Links reviews by categories, not date, so while he might be behind with some categories he's quite quick with reviews in others.
No traffic from these sites looks like you've been rejected.
All send very good traffic. Some send shit-loads of hits, but all of them send a nice amount.

FetishPhiles - behind on reviews, same as Debauchery.
I've heard nice things about them.

Preacher · 2007-01-26, 09:10 PM

http://www.cfnmparty.co.uk has always been good to me.

You aren't getting listed because you're links are blind, at least from what I can tell after two clicks of the first freesite you listed. In fact you may have a

recip on there, I can't locate that first site on his list.

MrYum · 2007-01-26, 09:50 PM

Wow...damn fine way to alienate link list owners

The first three of your samples have blind links...never would have made it past the warning page here.

Looks like you had cleaned up the blind links on the last site, but I'd suspect you may have already been internally blacklisted by some of those sites. Some of the other sites on your list appear to be doa from a submitters point of view.

Some of the others send great traffic, and are simply behind on reviews. If you hadn't been a dick with this thread, I'd probably be more willing to tell you which ones those are.

Always interesting to watch someone fuck themselves in the ass

dareutwo · 2007-01-26, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrYum

Always interesting to watch someone fuck themselves in the ass

Bill · 2007-01-26, 10:44 PM

So, I guess the message is, if you're a lowly freesite submitter keep your mouth shut on GG&J.

Kissing butt, that gets a thumbs up.

Say that some linklists aren't worth subbing to, and you get jumped on with both feet by all the linklist owners.

His list is a relevant list. It's real data, that reflects facts we all know about certain linklists. Okay, he's somewhat misinterpreted it, and he has sites that many of you would not list.

But he's got a point. And all of us freesite submitters, and many of you linklist owners, know he's got a point.

He's just dumb enough to say it out loud.

Jel · 2007-01-26, 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill

So, I guess the message is, if you're a lowly freesite submitter keep your mouth shut on GG&J.

Kissing butt, that gets a thumbs up.

Say that some linklists aren't worth subbing to, and you get jumped on with both feet by all the linklist owners.

His list is a relevant list. It's real data, that reflects facts we all know about certain linklists. Okay, he's somewhat misinterpreted it, and he has sites that many of you would not list.

But he's got a point. And all of us freesite submitters, and many of you linklist owners, know he's got a point.

He's just dumb enough to say it out loud.

No point saying I or others sent him no traffic if he isn't even listed. I've never been listed at Persian Kitty, does that mean she sends no traffic?

ponygirl · 2007-01-26, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill

So, I guess the message is, if you're a lowly freesite submitter keep your mouth shut on GG&J.

Kissing butt, that gets a thumbs up.

Say that some linklists aren't worth subbing to, and you get jumped on with both feet by all the linklist owners.

His list is a relevant list. It's real data, that reflects facts we all know about certain linklists. Okay, he's somewhat misinterpreted it, and he has sites that many of you would not list.

But he's got a point. And all of us freesite submitters, and many of you linklist owners, know he's got a point.

He's just dumb enough to say it out loud.

I know what you mean, it was the word 'blacklist' that did it, obviously. Most of us don't take that word very lightly around here. I think if it weren't for that one word he would have been fine & we would have told him that it was the blind links that were keeping him from getting listed.

Lesson learned to other newbies: you don't have to shut up but try to be tactful, especially if we don't know you

Useless · 2007-01-26, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill

Say that some linklists aren't worth subbing to, and you get jumped on with both feet by all the linklist owners.

His list is a relevant list. It's real data, that reflects facts we all know about certain linklists. Okay, he's somewhat misinterpreted it, and he has sites that many of you would not list.

But he's got a point. And all of us freesite submitters, and many of you linklist owners, know he's got a point.

He's just dumb enough to say it out loud.

I see nothing wrong with sharing pertinent data. I doubt anyone is surprised that certain lists send more traffic than others. Using the term black list is what creates the ire in this thread. That idiotic attempt at a smiley in the thread title doesn't help either.

I told him to add my sites to his moronic list for a couple of reasons. The thread's title is shite. His list is erroneous, being that it is based on his crap sites which one shouldn't expect to get listed. His example free sites are full of blind links - and I'm no blind link nazi. Also, I'm always the first to admit that I don't push buckets full of traffic. Really, I'm helping him by telling him to not bother submitting to me.

The wise and experienced free site submitter would create a list of seemingly inactive link lists and ask if everyone is seeing the same results without pre-judging the lists just in case every one except he/her is getting listed.

SheepGuy · 2007-01-27, 01:59 AM

I've made a total of 2 free sites this year, I'll make more but it's not my forte, and I got listed on a few of the sites he "black listed". The words "black listed" didn't really piss me off, it's just that the post was bullshit. Nobody can tell me with a straight face that they submitted 50 quality sites to Hoes and didn't get 15 hits.

SaucyPanties · 2007-01-27, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill

So, I guess the message is, if you're a lowly freesite submitter keep your mouth shut on GG&J.

Kissing butt, that gets a thumbs up.

Say that some linklists aren't worth subbing to, and you get jumped on with both feet by all the linklist owners.

His list is a relevant list. It's real data, that reflects facts we all know about certain linklists. Okay, he's somewhat misinterpreted it, and he has sites that many of you would not list.

But he's got a point. And all of us freesite submitters, and many of you linklist owners, know he's got a point.

He's just dumb enough to say it out loud.

I am new to free site building and submitting, whilst I found it frustrating that you want immediate traffic, listings and replies to your submissions it is common sense that some will take longer than others. I don't really want to name names and make some seem better than others but I know Jel replied and helped my husband with our free sites and I have great respect for him.

On these boards Sheep Guy and Useless Warrior have both given great advice when asked (along with others) and Hoes and LOR's have both listed my sites within 2-3 days and traffic from them both was good. Other link lists were maybe not so hot in sending traffic but they have some good PR and at the end of the day, how much traffic am I going to send them? I thought I had done something wrong with Mr Yum and Jays so a polite email to them both and I found out that one was behind and just catching-up and the other hit delete by mistake and asked me to submit again.

It is the tone with which Samoseks started this thread, would Hoes even care they were on his black list? Samoseks could have easily searched this category and asked Hoes why was my site not listed on the appropriate thread.

Please do not think this is an ass licking reply but there are right ways and wrong ways to go about this type of thing. As has already been said, who in their right mind would believe Hoes have sent only 15 visits? At the end of the day, free site submitters need the links lists more than the link lists need us at the moment so until that shift happens (which I doubt it ever will) learn to be polite.

grundic · 2007-01-31, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrYum

Always interesting to watch someone fuck themselves in the ass

2007-01-26, 07:08 PM	#1
KG Gary I can now put whatever I want in this space Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: South East UK Posts: 744	15 hits could still yield a sign up, and it doesn't cost you anything, so if you're getting listed regularly and there's no other issues why not keep on supporting the people sending you those free 15 visitors? Todays small link list could be tomorrow's big link list, and loyalty goes a long long way. Seems like this blacklist thing isn't the best idea, even if you're half-joking. Hoes review within a couple of days. You'll know if you've been listed there. FreesiteXXX, Virexy-Porn, & cfnmparty all review quite quickly - within a week or two I think. Mark from Mark's Links reviews by categories, not date, so while he might be behind with some categories he's quite quick with reviews in others. No traffic from these sites looks like you've been rejected. All send very good traffic. Some send shit-loads of hits, but all of them send a nice amount. FetishPhiles - behind on reviews, same as Debauchery. I've heard nice things about them. __________________ Sponsors that used to convert with freesites Over 700 clean freesites

2007-01-26, 09:10 PM	#2
Preacher There's Xanax in my thurible! Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Wherever they screw on my head Posts: 2,441	http://www.cfnmparty.co.uk has always been good to me. You aren't getting listed because you're links are blind, at least from what I can tell after two clicks of the first freesite you listed. In fact you may have a recip on there, I can't locate that first site on his list. __________________ NSCash * This Depraved World

2007-01-26, 09:50 PM	#3
MrYum Arghhhh...submit yer sites ya ruddy swabs! Join Date: May 2004 Location: Sunny Florida! Posts: 5,108	Wow...damn fine way to alienate link list owners The first three of your samples have blind links...never would have made it past the warning page here. Looks like you had cleaned up the blind links on the last site, but I'd suspect you may have already been internally blacklisted by some of those sites. Some of the other sites on your list appear to be doa from a submitters point of view. Some of the others send great traffic, and are simply behind on reviews. If you hadn't been a dick with this thread, I'd probably be more willing to tell you which ones those are. Always interesting to watch someone fuck themselves in the ass __________________ Porno Flixxx Submissions SOTI Site Submissions Free Porn Resource Submissions

2007-01-27, 01:59 AM	#9
SheepGuy It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 2,527	I've made a total of 2 free sites this year, I'll make more but it's not my forte, and I got listed on a few of the sites he "black listed". The words "black listed" didn't really piss me off, it's just that the post was bullshit. Nobody can tell me with a straight face that they submitted 50 quality sites to Hoes and didn't get 15 hits. __________________ If the Environment was a bank, they would have saved it by now.

2007-01-26, 10:44 PM	#5
Bill Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip! Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 3,914	So, I guess the message is, if you're a lowly freesite submitter keep your mouth shut on GG&J. Kissing butt, that gets a thumbs up. Say that some linklists aren't worth subbing to, and you get jumped on with both feet by all the linklist owners. His list is a relevant list. It's real data, that reflects facts we all know about certain linklists. Okay, he's somewhat misinterpreted it, and he has sites that many of you would not list. But he's got a point. And all of us freesite submitters, and many of you linklist owners, know he's got a point. He's just dumb enough to say it out loud.