The Programs Listed In This Thread Have Shitty HFS's & They Are Wasting Their Money

[Wazdom]

I understand the issue well, but I do not agree with every sponsor listed .. one in particular distributes HFS that IMHO is much better than the ARS examples GG posted in this thread http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...ad.php?t=38677 .. eg
http://galleries1.gagonmycock.com/ho...678/index.html deecash
http://hfs.adultmoviematrix.com/pigg...piggyface.html ars
yes deecash is using the paysite in the title, but what fricking use is "Piggy Face" .. better to have "adult movie matrix", far more likely to hit a search term.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by Wazdom

I understand the issue well, but I do not agree with every sponsor listed .. one in particular distributes HFS that IMHO is much better than the ARS examples GG posted in this thread http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...ad.php?t=38677 .. eg
http://galleries1.gagonmycock.com/ho...678/index.html deecash
http://hfs.adultmoviematrix.com/pigg...piggyface.html ars
yes deecash is using the paysite in the title, but what fricking use is "Piggy Face" .. better to have "adult movie matrix", far more likely to hit a search term.

You're going to compare 1 site out of 200+ from ARS that has a shitty name (and yes, it is a really shitty name) against a site that Dee Cash that looks EXACTLY the same as every other HFS they have ever put out?

You're worried about SE implications? If 500 webmasters promote the same HFS, only 1 of those URL's will get in the SE (if it even does) & odds are that it's the one with your code is slim.

Using your example, what SE term(s) will that Dee Cash site get? The only text on that entire site is the 2257/copyright info.

[Linkster]

Wazdom - I agree that the titles on some of those sites are definitely "out there" And you are correct that the titles should be something SE worthwhile - what GG said