NCAA Football 2007

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by dareutwo

I don't give a crap about strength of schedule, if you're undefeated, you should deserve a shot at the title.

Surely you jest. Look at Hawaii's schedule Hawaii

They are undefeated but they didn't play anyone of substance. They are one of the two best teams in the country? They should play for the national championship? I think not.

[Toby]

Originally Posted by Licker4U

Surely you jest. Look at Hawaii's schedule Hawaii

You also have to consider the larger than normal home field advantage. Hawaii only played two games against opponents that finished the season above .500 and both of those games were in Hawaii. They don't play any non-conference games on the road.

Georgia on the other hand has defeated 4 ranked teams, three of those on the road. We'll find out on January 1 if Hawaii really belongs in a BCS bowl game.

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by Toby

Georgia on the other hand has defeated 4 ranked teams, three of those on the road. We'll find out on January 1 if Hawaii really belongs in a BCS bowl game.

The Sugar Bowl will be renamed "The Blood Bowl". GA is gonna kick some pineapple ass.

Hmmm, I just noticed something. Ohio State didn't beat a single team that was ranked in the top 20 at the time they played. |shocking| Strength of schedule should be put back into the BCS computer program. Teams playing most or all of their games against "homecoming" type teams should have that taken into account as well as those defeating top ranked teams.

I vote for a playoff but as one sports writer said, the regular season would become less important … fans would have difficulty traveling from playoff site to playoff site … regular-season attendance might suffer … the bowls might be adversely affected.

Oh damn....

[Toby]

Originally Posted by Toby

We'll find out on January 1 if Hawaii really belongs in a BCS bowl game.

Georgia 41 Hawaii 10

I guess we now have the answer to that question.