Is this a bad gallery?

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Receptor

I thought Jesus was a guy.

Hence, "explore a new context". Making him into a hot naked chick would be a pretty new context.

If I had Photoshop skills, I'd take one of these pics, put it in frame, and place it on the wall behind Foxy Angel in that scene where she's getting her cock sucked while dressed like a nun. Push the boundaries...

Also, I'd stay away from anything Mohammed-related. There's a big difference from possibly angering religious folk who may picket outside your office and pissing off people willing to kill you for mis-naming a stuffed animal.

[Bobc01]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

Also, I'd stay away from anything Mohammed-related. There's a big difference from possibly angering religious folk who may picket outside your office and pissing off people willing to kill you for mis-naming a stuffed animal.

Don't be such a pussy, they'd kill you just for being an American, whether you piss them off by insulting their religion or not.

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Bobc01

Don't be such a pussy, they'd kill you just for being an American, whether you piss them off by insulting their religion or not.

I'm not one of those guys who'd tell them, "I'm American and proud. What you goin' do 'bout it?"

It would be more like, "I'm Canadian, eh."

[Motorhead]

Actually, the gallery is nothing new. The concept was derived from the band, Cradle of Filth. Their artwork on posters and t-shirts consisting of half-naked nuns masturbating with crosses, crucified in expressions of sexual ecstasy and a famous t-shirt that stated Jesus was a Cunt. Their live stage shows, at one point, were even more explicit and sacrilegious. Hell, even Sam Kinison was on a cross, asking if anyone had a hammer!

[AdultSiteWorks]

Doesn't meet my personal taste

RB