The Programs Listed In This Thread Have Shitty HFS's & They Are Wasting Their Money

[oldbrad]

I personally like a "non professional" looking site. one that looks like a submitted site as opposed to a paysite. They are well made from a desing and appearance, but i like more text, less graphics and clearly defined ads or banners with text.

I also, presonally, like clearly defined galleries instead of thumbnail looking images linked to a gallery with no "gallery 1", etc text. I see the alt, but like something in text.

You already mentioned adding titles instead of the paysite.

These are my preferences, but you definately want the big guys opinions as they'll send the most traffic.

[Jakke PNG]

Originally Posted by oldbrad

I personally like a "non professional" looking site. one that looks like a submitted site as opposed to a paysite. They are well made from a desing and appearance, but i like more text, less graphics and clearly defined ads or banners with text.

I'll take that into account when I do the next batch of freesites sometime in the future

Originally Posted by oldbrad

I also, presonally, like clearly defined galleries instead of thumbnail looking images linked to a gallery with no "gallery 1", etc text. I see the alt, but like something in text.

Shouldn't be hard to put a text under the thumb or whatever to mark them as gallery. Will have a slave do that if I remember tomorrow (it's 3 something am now. heh)

Originally Posted by oldbrad

You already mentioned adding titles instead of the paysite.

These are my preferences, but you definately want the big guys opinions as they'll send the most traffic.

Yeah, I'll change the foldernames to match the graphic/title on the site. (and I think I ought to change the actual <title> as well).

I've been out of the freesite loop for so long that I don't even know who the big guys are above the ones that were big guys 3 years ago.